Text versus Symbols

 Text versus Symbols

To evaluate the benefits of text and symbolic displays in highway signs relative to their familiarity on their comprehension speed and accuracy, drivers were presented with 30 traffic signs varying in their level of familiarity in three display conditions: 

• standard symbol-only
• text-only and 
• symbol + text. 

Speed and accuracy of comprehension were recorded. Display condition and familiarity significantly affected both correctness of the answers and reaction time. Correctness improved when the symbol was shown with text, especially when the sign was less familiar.

This reinforces the belief that adding text improves the comprehension and reduces the time it takes to comprehend the sign, especially of unfamiliar signs.

Adding text could be a simple solution to making (unfamiliar) signs more understandable to a greater segment of the driving population without compromising comprehension time, thereby increasing traffic safety.

Symbolic images used for highway traffic signs are not always appropriate. 

Familiarity, standardization, and compatibility improve comprehension.

Violations of these ergonomic principles of design reduce comprehension. 

In such cases a text improves sign comprehension and reduces comprehension time.

Hence, it can be concluded that influence of ergonomic principles – 

• familiarity
• standardization and 
• symbol-concept compatibility – on traffic sign comprehension showed that comprehension is highly correlated with the compliance with these ergonomic design principles